Abstract

Oligothiophenes are especially appealing due to their promising applications in different fields, including photosensitive devices. In this context, anchoring a selected substituent on the main structure of the starting material can induce changes in redox and spectroscopic features, according to the nature of the substituent and its position on central or terminal rings. Here, an electrochemical and spectroscopic comparison between 2,2′:5′,2″-terthiophene (2), 5-Br-terthiophene (3) and 5-ethynyl-terthiophene (5-ET) is reported, aimed at elucidating the effect of the nature of the substituent on the energy gap value of the terthiophene skeleton. Furthermore, in order to understand the influence of a selected substituent in varying its position on the terthiophene backbone, 5-ET is compared to the previously described 3′-ethynyl-terthiophene (3′-ET). Experimental results are confirmed by DFT calculations, showing a higher extension of the electron density in 5-ET compared to 2 and 3, as well as to 3′-ET. In addition, as a consequence of the presence of the unsaturated fragment on the C-5-position, the energy gap value of poly-5-ET (the electrogenerated film from 5-ET) appears significantly lower than poly-2 and poly-3. Finally, the higher conjugation effect of a terminal acetylene fragment compared to a central one is confirmed by the energy gap values of poly-5-ET and poly-3′-ET.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.