Abstract

Recent work showed that two species of hammerhead sharks operated as a double oscillating system, where frequency and amplitude differed in the anterior and posterior parts of the body. We hypothesized that a double oscillating system would be present in a large, volitionally swimming, conventionally shaped carcharhinid shark. Swimming kinematics analyses provide quantification to mechanistically examine swimming within and among species. Here, we quantify blacktip shark (Carcharhinus limbatus) volitional swimming kinematics under natural conditions to assess variation between anterior and posterior body regions and demonstrate the presence of a double oscillating system. We captured footage of 80 individual blacktips swimming in the wild using a DJI Phantom 4 Pro aerial drone. The widespread accessibility of aerial drone technology has allowed for greater observation of wild marine megafauna. We used Loggerpro motion tracking software to track five anatomical landmarks frame by frame to calculate tailbeat frequency, tailbeat amplitude, speed, and anterior/posterior variables: amplitude and frequency of the head and tail, and the body curvature measured as anterior and posterior flexion. We found significant increases in tailbeat frequency and amplitude with increasing swimming speed. Tailbeat frequency decreased and tailbeat amplitude increased as posterior flexion amplitude increased. We found significant differences between anterior and posterior amplitudes and frequencies, suggesting a double oscillating modality of wave propagation. These data support previous work that hypothesized the importance of a double oscillating system for increased sensory perception. These methods demonstrate the utility of quantifying swimming kinematics of wild animals through direct observation, with the potential to apply a biomechanical perspective to movement ecology paradigms.

Highlights

  • The undulatory wave used for swimming can vary an individual fish, among species, and with postural reconfiguration [1,2,3,4,5]

  • Swimming kinematics can vary by habitat and experimental conditions; for example, sharks swimming in a flume expended more energy, and tailbeat amplitude decreased relative to speed, when compared to sharks swimming in a semi-natural pond [10]

  • We found a significant relationship between swimming speed and kinematic variables (Chisq = 104.25; DF = 3; p < 0.001)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The undulatory wave used for swimming can vary an individual fish, among species, and with postural reconfiguration [1,2,3,4,5]. Head yaw can be decoupled from tail beat frequency, which suggests that more than one wavelength may be generated during swimming. This is known as a double oscillating system, where the undulatory wave in the anterior body differs from the posterior body, and has been identified in sturgeon, eels, and lamprey [1,2,3]. Recent work showed a double oscillating system where wave frequency was greater, and amplitude was smaller in the anterior body compared to the posterior body [9]. We utilize an aerial drone to quantify swimming kinematics of a coastal shark species to determine if sharks employ a double oscillating system under

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call