Abstract

Understanding clast dispersal from subaqueous volcanism is hampered by uncertainty in the source and extent of seafloor deposits. Extensive sampling in situ of seafloor deposits from the 2012 submarine eruption of Havre volcano provides an ideal opportunity to assess subaqueous dispersal. The 2012 Havre eruption produced 14 lavas/domes, a pumice raft, and three seafloor clastic deposits. At Havre the source of clastic deposits can be confidently identified, and deposit thickness, grain size, and distribution are also well-constrained. We examine a seafloor deposit termed subunit 3 (S3) generated in the 2012 Havre eruption to investigate dispersal of fine lapilli and ash, and the eruption conditions that generated this deposit. Subunit 3 is the third from bottom of four subunits that make up the Ash with Lapilli unit. Subunit 3 is composed of ash with highly elongate shapes, unique within the 2012 Havre deposits. It thickens and coarsens toward Lava G, also generated in the 2012 eruption, located on the southwest wall of Havre caldera. Lava G is the only lava produced during the 2012 Havre eruption that has a glassy carapace with elongated vesicles and a fibrous texture. We infer the source of unit S3 is Lava G, due to the spatial pattern of deposit thinning and fining away with distance from this lava, and the morphological and microtextural similarity of ash with the Lava G carapace rock. Grain size and transport distance of ash from S3 are used to test a simple 1D model addressing both clast dispersal by a buoyant thermal plume above an explosive eruption, and by penetrative convection during effusive lava emplacement. Comparison of calculated maximum dispersal distances with grain size and transport distance show that a jet forming eruption generating a turbulent plume is required to generate S3. We suggest that S3 was generated by hybrid explosive-effusive activity during the effusion of Lava G. Using model results we calculate maximum clast dispersal distances across a range of grain sizes for both dispersal mechanisms. The calculated maximum clast dispersal distance has wide implications globally for interpretation of ash deposits from subaqueous eruptions.

Highlights

  • The generation of ash is typically associated with energetic fragmentation during explosive volcanism (e.g., Walker, 1981; Zimanowski et al, 2003), though ash formation during effusive activity by non-explosive brecciation and comminution of a brittle crust has long been noted (e.g., Fink, 1983; Manley, 1996)

  • In all but two seafloor ash samples collected at Havre, grains from all layers sampled at a single site became mixed together, TABLE 1 | Characteristics of samples containing Elongate tube-vesicle particles (S3) at Havre

  • The unprecedented sample set collected following the 2012 Havre eruption allowed individual layers associated with specific eruptive phases to be identified in the seafloor Ash with Lapilli unit

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The generation of ash is typically associated with energetic fragmentation during explosive volcanism (e.g., Walker, 1981; Zimanowski et al, 2003), though ash formation during effusive activity by non-explosive brecciation and comminution of a brittle crust has long been noted (e.g., Fink, 1983; Manley, 1996). The physical properties of water in subaqueous settings complicates the interpretation of both formation by fragmentation and dispersal of ash, even for deposits dispersed by a plume (White et al, 2003, 2015; Cas and Giordano, 2014). Deep subaqueous eruptions (>500 m depth) are significantly modulated by the physical properties of water both indirectly (hydrostatic pressure, increased viscosity of water relative to air) and directly (rapid heat transfer) (Wohletz, 1983; Head and Wilson, 2003; White et al, 2003, 2015; Cas and Giordano, 2014). The higher viscosity and density of water compared to air means that convective plumes driven by heat from the underlying lava flow could conceivably disperse non-explosively formed ash over long distances (Barreyre et al, 2011)

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call