Abstract

Descriptive analysis via trained sensory panels has great power to facilitate flavor improvement in fresh fruits and vegetables. When paired with an understanding of fruit volatile organic compounds, descriptive analysis can help uncover the chemical drivers of sensory attributes. In the present study, 213 strawberry samples representing 56 cultivars and advanced selections were sampled over seven seasons and subjected to both sensory descriptive and chemical analyses. Principal component analysis and K-cluster analyses of sensory data highlighted three groups of strawberry samples, with one classified as superior with high sweetness and strawberry flavor and low sourness and green flavor. Partial least square models revealed 20 sweetness-enhancing volatile organic compounds and two sweetness-reducing volatiles, many of which overlap with previous consumer sensory studies. Volatiles modulating green, sour, astringent, overripe, woody, and strawberry flavors were also identified. The relationship between soluble solids content (SSC) and sweetness was modeled with Bayesian regression, generating probabilities for sweetness levels from varying levels of soluble solids. A hierarchical Bayesian model with month effects indicated that SSC is most correlated to sweetness toward the end of the fruiting season, making this the best period to make phenotypic selections for soluble solids. Comparing effects from genotypes, harvest months, and their interactions on sensory attributes revealed that sweetness, sourness, and firmness were largely controlled by genetics. These findings help formulate a paradigm for improvement of eating quality in which sensory analyses drive the targeting of chemicals important to consumer-desired attributes, which further drive the development of genetic tools for improvement of flavor.

Highlights

  • The garden strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa) is popular for its pleasant aroma and sweet taste

  • The main objectives of the present study were to (1) combine descriptive sensory analysis and chemical analysis to explore the volatile drivers of sweetness and sourness as well as astringency, green, strawberry, overripe, and woody flavors in fresh strawberries, (2) construct Bayesian models to better define the relationship between sweetness and solids content (SSC), and (3) utilize a complex set of strawberry genotypes and environments to better understand the genetic and environmental effects underlying sensory attributes

  • The smallest range was observed for woody flavor, from 0.2 to 2.2 (Supplementary Table 3)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The garden strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa) is popular for its pleasant aroma and sweet taste. High levels of sweetness and intense flavor are the leading factors driving frequent strawberry purchases (Colquhoun et al, 2012). This is consistent with consumer sensory studies that identify sweetness intensity and flavor intensity as the top sensory attributes associated with consumer liking. While a consumer panel is useful for revealing relationships between some sensory attributes and hedonics (Oliver et al, 2018a), it requires a large number of panelists due to variation from diverse demographic backgrounds (Knee, 2002). While a DA does not directly quantify hedonic responses, it can be used to interpret consumer liking when the same samples are tested by consumer panels (Lawless and Heymann, 2010). Trained DA panels have been widely implemented for sensory evaluations of fruits and vegetables under different storage conditions, maturity stages, spans of postharvest storage, or cultural practices (Cliff et al, 1998; Varela et al, 2005; Kårlund et al, 2015)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call