Voiding Time for the Evaluation of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms in Men – A Potential Option for Addressing Disparity Related Access to Urodynamic Testing

Abstract

ObjectiveTo investigate voiding time (VT) in asymptomatic and symptomatic men, and compare VT to other parameters such as maximum flow rates (Qmax) as a possible solution to disparity related lack of access to standard urodynamic testing. MethodsWe conducted a controlled prospective study on a total of 30 patients. Exclusion criteria included ongoing medical therapy for lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) or a history of invasive therapy for LUTS. Patients completed International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) questionnaire, uroflowmetry, and post-void residual (PVR) testing. Symptomatic LUTS was defined as an IPSS ≥8. ResultsOn univariate analysis, men with a symptomatic LUTS had a significantly longer VT than asymptomatic men (30.6 seconds (Interquartile rage [IQR] 24.2-42.4) vs 20.5 seconds (IQR 16.6-40.5), P = .04). VT was not otherwise associated with age, race, or primary complaint. There was trend towards lower Qmax in symptomatic patients (13.4 vs 20.5 seconds, P = .07), although this was not statistically significant. Our study demonstrated that the sensitivity of a VT ≥23.5 seconds, or probability of observing a VT exceeding 23.5 seconds when the patient has a symptomatic IPSS, is 85%. On sensitivity and specificity analysis, there was no difference between the abilities of VT and Qmax to predict that a patient would have symptomatic LUTS (P = .80). ConclusionIn this controlled prospective study, we found that VT was as accurate as Qmax in predicting symptomatic IPSS scores. This novel finding might improve the ability to diagnose and treat LUTS, especially in primary care offices and underserved areas.