Abstract

The study of voice perception in congenitally blind individuals allows researchers rare insight into how a lifetime of visual deprivation affects the development of voice perception. Previous studies have suggested that blind adults outperform their sighted counterparts in low-level auditory tasks testing spatial localization and pitch discrimination, as well as in verbal speech processing; however, blind persons generally show no advantage in nonverbal voice recognition or discrimination tasks. The present study is the first to examine whether visual experience influences the development of social stereotypes that are formed on the basis of nonverbal vocal characteristics (i.e., voice pitch). Groups of 27 congenitally or early-blind adults and 23 sighted controls assessed the trustworthiness, competence, and warmth of men and women speaking a series of vowels, whose voice pitches had been experimentally raised or lowered. Blind and sighted listeners judged both men’s and women’s voices with lowered pitch as being more competent and trustworthy than voices with raised pitch. In contrast, raised-pitch voices were judged as being warmer than were lowered-pitch voices, but only for women’s voices. Crucially, blind and sighted persons did not differ in their voice-based assessments of competence or warmth, or in their certainty of these assessments, whereas the association between low pitch and trustworthiness in women’s voices was weaker among blind than sighted participants. This latter result suggests that blind persons may rely less heavily on nonverbal cues to trustworthiness compared to sighted persons. Ultimately, our findings suggest that robust perceptual associations that systematically link voice pitch to the social and personal dimensions of a speaker can develop without visual input.

Highlights

  • The study of voice perception in congenitally blind individuals allows researchers rare insight into how a lifetime of visual deprivation affects the development of voice perception

  • Kingdom result suggests that blind persons may rely less heavily on nonverbal cues to trustworthiness compared to sighted persons

  • Behavioral studies have provided some evidence for superior verbal or speech processing abilities in blind persons—for example, in verbal memory (Amedi, Raz, Pianka, Malach, & Zohary, 2003) and speech sound discrimination (Hugdahl et al, 2004; Muchnik, Efrati, Nemeth, Malin, & Hildesheimer, 1991) tasks—blind persons generally show no advantage in nonverbal voice recognition or discrimination tasks (Gougoux et al, 2009; Günzburger, Bresser, & Keurs, 1987; Winograd, Kerr, & Spence, 1984; but see Bull, Rathborn, & Clifford, 1983)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The study of voice perception in congenitally blind individuals allows researchers rare insight into how a lifetime of visual deprivation affects the development of voice perception. The first of these states that blind persons may possess degraded acoustic perception relative to sighted persons, if visual experience is necessary to calibrate the other senses This first hypothesis has not garnered a great deal of support, as it is known that congenital blindness or the loss of vision early in life can cause substantial structural reorganization of the brain, wherein the structures typically specialized for vision are recruited for the processing of stimuli in other modalities, including audition, allowing normal hearing to develop without vision (reviewed in Kupers & Ptito, 2014; Rauschecker, 1995). A third, and the most recent, hypothesis posits that blind persons may possess Bsupra-normal^ nonvisual sensory capabilities, as a result of either perceptual learning (Gagnon, Ismaili, Ptito, & Kupers, 2015) or the reorganization of various brain areas (e.g., the occipital cortex; Leclerc, SaintAmour, Lavoie, Lassonde, & Lepore, 2000), suggesting that blind persons may outperform their sighted counterparts in nonvisual auditory tasks. There is some evidence that blind persons may process voices differently from sighted persons, these differences appear to arise predominantly in the processing of verbal rather than nonverbal information

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call