Abstract

ObjectivesThis study described voice use and lifestyle information from student speech-language pathologists (SLP) and assessed the impact of history gathering method on the acquired data. MethodsOne hundred sixty-two SLP students completed a detailed history form and estimated voice and life style parameters at study intake and subsequently tracked the same parameters daily for three consecutive weeks. Nonparametric statistical comparisons were applied to assess differences in estimates at intake versus the 3-week log. ResultsVoice problems diagnosed by a physician or SLP were reported by 11% of the students. A similar percentage reported frequent loud talking and heavy occupational voice demands beyond clinical training use. Furthermore, high stress was reported by 49%, frequent anxiety by 53%, and depression by 17%. Comparing data from study intake relative to the 3-week log, SLP students statistically significantly overestimated speaking time, and underestimated singing, second hand smoke exposure time, and hours of sleep. Additionally, they overestimated water intake and daily stress, and underestimated caffeine and alcohol intake, at the study onset versus the log. The experience of vocal fatigue was common within the 3-week log, but how a student identified at study intake on this parameter (experiencing it frequently or not) did not differentiate how many days of vocal fatigue were reported in 3 weeks. ConclusionsSLP students engage in some voice use and lifestyle behaviors that place them at risk for voice problems. The method of soliciting information about the voice and lifestyle of SLP students impacted the information obtained. Optimal methods of gathering accurate and reliable clinical history and voice us data are needed.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call