Abstract

Before implementing a bridge monitoring strategy, a bridge manager would like to know the return on investment. Moreover, in order to spend the available budget as efficiently as possible, the monitoring strategy should be optimized, i.e., the type of measurements but also the time and locations at which these are performed. For this purpose, the Value of Information (VoI) can be used. The VoI represents an estimate of the benefit that can be gained from a monitoring strategy before it is actually implemented. By comparing the VoI of different alternative strategies, the one with the highest VoI can be selected. As such, the VoI is a tool for objective decision-making. The calculation of the VoI is based on pre-posterior analyses, including Bayesian updating of model parameters based on yet unknown monitoring outcomes. When calculating the VoI for an actual case, some challenges arise. First, the calculation of the VoI requires a number of assumptions on different input parameters. Second, the VoI is computed by evaluating life-cycle costs for different possible outcomes of the monitoring strategy, leading to a high computational cost. However, for practical implementations, results are preferably available within an acceptable time span and are robust with respect to the chosen input parameters. In this work, the implementation of the VoI approach for optimization of monitoring strategies is investigated by a problem statement in a case study where a reinforced concrete girder bridge is considered. To perform this optimization, the VoI for different monitoring strategies is compared. The calculation time required for the Bayesian updating of the model parameters based on the available data is limited by using Maximum A Posteriori (MAP) estimates to approximate the posterior distribution. The VoI can be used both to optimize a monitoring strategy or for comparison of different strategies. To limit the number of required (computationally expensive) evaluations of the VoI, optimization of the monitoring strategy itself can be simplified by determining the optimal sensor locations beforehand, based on a different metric than the VoI. For this purpose, the information entropy is used, which expresses the difference between the prior and posterior uncertainty of the model parameters. Finally, the sensitivity of the VoI to different input parameters is investigated.

Highlights

  • In many countries, bridges are reaching the end of their lifetime

  • The Value of Information (VoI) is the difference in expected service-life cost for the prior maintenance strategy and the expected service-life cost when accounting for data provided by a proposed monitoring strategy [4]

  • When the VoI is calculated accounting for monitoring strategy 2 implemented at t = 35 years, the difference in posterior costs found based on the Maximum A Posteriori (MAP) estimates and Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) calculations is equal to €844.88 or 0.4% of the total bridge value

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Bridges are reaching the end of their lifetime. In order to optimize bridge maintenance under the existing budget constraints, condition-based maintenance can be performed instead of predictive-based maintenance (e.g., [1,2]). The costs in the calculation of the VoI correspond to the life-cycle costs, including costs for maintenance actions and repairs, costs for monitoring and inspection, and failure costs For all these costs, relevant values should be used as input in the VoI analysis. To evaluate the posterior costs, the expected value of the life-cycle costs is evaluated by taking the average over all possible monitoring outcomes In this analysis, for the different monitoring outcomes, posterior distributions of the model parameters and the corresponding updated probability of failure should be calculated. All the referred works have contributed greatly to the introduction of the VoI as an objective tool in decision-making It is not always clear how sensitive the computed VoI is to different choices for the relevant input parameters.

Calculation of the VoI
Approximating the Posterior Distribution
Optimization of Sensor Locations Using Information Entropy
Optimization of Time of Monitoring
Time Dependent Degradation
Monitoring Strategies
Repair Strategy
Approximation of the Posterior Distribution by MAP Estimates
Determination of Optimal Sensor Positions
Prior Distribution of the Corrosion Parameters
Scatter or Uncertainty on the Posterior Costs
Findings
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call