Abstract

Abstract. Long-term global monitoring of terrestrial gross primary production (GPP) is crucial for assessing ecosystem responses to global climate change. In recent decades, great advances have been made in estimating GPP and many global GPP datasets have been published. These datasets are based on observations from optical remote sensing, are upscaled from in situ measurements, or rely on process-based models. Although these approaches are well established within the scientific community, datasets nevertheless differ significantly. Here, we introduce the new VODCA2GPP dataset, which utilizes microwave remote sensing estimates of vegetation optical depth (VOD) to estimate GPP at the global scale for the period 1988–2020. VODCA2GPP applies a previously developed carbon-sink-driven approach (Teubner et al., 2019, 2021) to estimate GPP from the Vegetation Optical Depth Climate Archive (Moesinger et al., 2020; Zotta et al., 2022​​​​​​​), which merges VOD observations from multiple sensors into one long-running, coherent data record. VODCA2GPP was trained and evaluated against FLUXNET in situ observations of GPP and compared against largely independent state-of-the-art GPP datasets from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS), FLUXCOM, and the TRENDY-v7 process-based model ensemble. The site-level evaluation with FLUXNET GPP indicates an overall robust performance of VODCA2GPP with only a small bias and good temporal agreement. The comparisons with MODIS, FLUXCOM, and TRENDY-v7 show that VODCA2GPP exhibits very similar spatial patterns across all biomes but with a consistent positive bias. In terms of temporal dynamics, a high agreement was found for regions outside the humid tropics, with median correlations around 0.75. Concerning anomalies from the long-term climatology, VODCA2GPP correlates well with MODIS and TRENDY-v7 (Pearson's r 0.53 and 0.61) but less well with FLUXCOM (Pearson's r 0.29). A trend analysis for the period 1988–2019 did not exhibit a significant trend in VODCA2GPP at the global scale but rather suggests regionally different long-term changes in GPP. For the shorter overlapping observation period (2003–2015) of VODCA2GPP, MODIS, and the TRENDY-v7 ensemble, significant increases in global GPP were found. VODCA2GPP can complement existing GPP products and is a valuable dataset for the assessment of large-scale and long-term changes in GPP for global vegetation and carbon cycle studies. The VODCA2GPP dataset is available at the TU Data Repository of TU Wien (https://doi.org/10.48436/1k7aj-bdz35, Wild et al., 2021).

Highlights

  • Gross primary production (GPP) describes vegetation’s conversion of atmospheric CO2 to carbohydrates through photosynthesis and is the largest CO2 flux in the carbon cycle (Beer et al, 2010)

  • The VOD2GPP model makes use of several vegetation optical depth (VOD) variables to represent the sum of NPP and Ra: the original VOD time series (VOD), which relates to maintenance respiration; temporal changes in VOD ( (VOD)), which relate to both growth respiration and NPP; and the temporal median of VOD (mdn(VOD)) derived from the complete time series, which serves as a proxy for vegetation density

  • Comparison of the latitudinal distribution of FLUXNET stations shows that the closest agreement in yearly gross primary production (GPP) is generally found in regions with a high density of FLUXNET in situ stations, while the largest discrepancies are found in regions with few or no FLUXNET stations

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Gross primary production (GPP) describes vegetation’s conversion of atmospheric CO2 to carbohydrates through photosynthesis and is the largest CO2 flux in the carbon cycle (Beer et al, 2010). GPP is considered the primary driver of the terrestrial carbon sink responsible for the uptake of approximately 30 % of anthropogenic CO2 emissions (Friedlingstein et al, 2020). GPP plays a key role in mitigating the negative effects of anthropogenic emissions. Estimates of global mean annual GPP range from 112 (Anav et al, 2015) to 175 Pg C yr−1 (Welp et al, 2011) but exhibit a high degree of interannual variability. GPP is strongly affected by increasing concentrations of CO2 in the atmosphere and the associated global climate change (Haverd et al, 2020; Schimel et al, 2015; Cox et al, 2000). Quantifying GPP is essential to understand the effect of climate variability and changes in atmospheric CO2 concentrations on the land carbon cycle (e.g. Baldocchi et al, 2016; Nemani et al, 2003)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call