Abstract

-Male Marsh Wrens' (Cistothorus palustris) sing with immediate variety (i.e. AB CDE . . .); they progress rapidly through their song repertoires and tend to countersing with same song types. Intensive study of two hand-reared males in laboratory now confirms that both song types and song sequences are learned. Furthermore, leader/follower roles during countersinging duels are not determined at random. In this study, Bird 1 dominated Bird 2 in physical encounters; Bird 2 often followed (i.e. matched) song type just sung by Bird 1, but Bird 1 matched songs of Bird 2 only when songs of latter were electronically amplified. The leader/follower roles in countersinging may be ritualized expressions of dominance and subordinance, respectively, and could reveal to both males and females relative vigor of combatants. Received 20 November 1978, accepted 26 March 1979. IMITATION plays an important role in ontogeny of song in many songbird species (e.g. Nottebohm 1972, Kroodsma 1977), and if juveniles either remain at or return to locality where songs were learned, interacting breeding males will possess similar songs. If a male has only one song type in his repertoire, temporal adjustments in song delivery may be used to achieve interference or avoidance (Wasserman 1977), but when males imitate several songs and develop sizeable repertoires of different song types, potential for complexity of interactions during countersinging is escalated. Studies of Chaffinches (Fringilla coelebs), Great Tits (Parus major), Black-crested Titmice (Parus bicolor), Cardinals (Cardinalis cardinalis), Rufous-sided Towhees (Pipilo erythrophthalmus), etc., have revealed that neighboring males often respond to one another or to a tape recording (of a song from local dialect) with matching song types (Hinde 1958, Gompertz 1961, Lemon 1968a, b, Kroodsma 1971, respectively; see Falls and Krebs 1975 for an apparent exception to this pattern). Males of these species typically sing a song type several times before switching to another (i.e. AAAA . . . BBBB . . .), but potential for vocal interactions is further heightened when successive songs are usually different (i.e. ABCDE . . .), as in Marsh Wren (Verner 1975). With such a rapid interchange of song types, roles of leader and follower in countersinging become immediately evident. Verner (1975: 295) speculated that this song-matching during countersinging reflected the dominance/subordinance relationships between neighbors, but because of complexity of both song repertoire and interactions in field, he could not adequately document relationship among males. Having studied this phenomenon in laboratory with hand-reared birds, I can now (1) confirm that both song types and favored sequences in this complex behavior are learned, (2) reveal that roles of leader and follower in countersinging duels are not determined at random, and (3) support hypothesis that such vocal dueling, together with loudness of delivery, is a reflection of size, age, and/or dominance/subordinance relationships and might be I See Kroodsma and Verner (1978) for encouraged change of common name from Long-billed Marsh Wren to Marsh Wren. 506 The Auk 96: 506-515. July 1979 This content downloaded from 157.55.39.147 on Wed, 18 May 2016 06:05:48 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms July 1979] Vocal Dueling among Marsh Wrens 507

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call