Abstract
This article discusses the scope and limits of consistent interpretation in Switzerland and discusses the extent to which construing national law in conformity with public international law is indicative of the ‘friendliness towards international law’ of a constitution. I argue, first, that consistent interpretation in Switzerland has certainly served the cause of friendliness towards international law, but that three conditions must be met before it can come into play. Second, the article concludes that consistent interpretation is, nevertheless, of limited use in ‘measuring’ the international law friendliness of the Swiss legal system because consistent interpretation does not come into play in numerous constellations and narrows the view to a modest number of court cases. In relation to the sum of challenges related to the implementation of international law domestically, consistent interpretation is a marginal phenomenon.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht / Heidelberg Journal of International Law
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.