Abstract
Paxos, Viewstamped Replication, and Zab are replication protocols for high-availability in asynchronous environments with crash failures. Claims have been made about their similarities and differences. But how does one determine whether two protocols are the same, and if not, how significant are the differences? We address these questions using refinement mappings. Protocols are expressed as succinct specifications that are progressively refined to executable implementations. Doing so enables a principled understanding of the correctness of design decisions for implementing the protocols. Additionally, differences that have a significant impact on performance are surfaced by this exercise.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
