Abstract
Resolution-cum-amnesty scheme may generate revenue in the short run, by including delinquent taxpayers and those with pending disputes. But, in the long run, several critics have mentioned it as a disincentivizing scheme for citizens who are complying with the law. Further, in the absence of a provision to the effect, the non-severability of issues in a single appeal could lead to adverse consequences for an individual opting for the scheme. Other fall-outs of the scheme could be issues with its interpretation. Therefore, this paper shall address issues ranging from the very basic idea of tax as a the contract between the state and its citizens and how such schemes negatively impact this contract, ultimately creating a tax ecosystem that disincentivises compliance. To issues with the implementation of such scheme and where it stands on the merits of its aims and objects sought to be achieved, concluded by a factual assessment of reduction in pending litigations.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.