Vitrification does not affect birth weight: lessons from the oocyte donation model

Abstract

Research questionIs embryo cryopreservation a cause of high birth weight and large for gestational age (LGA) in singletons resulting from vitrified–warmed embryo transfer? DesignRetrospective cohort study evaluating 670 oocyte recipients who underwent fresh (367 cycles) or vitrified–warmed embryo transfer (303 cycles) at Instituto Bernabeu between July 2017 and March 2019. All single blastocyst transfers carried out in an artificial cycle that resulted in a singleton live birth were included. ResultsMaternal age (42.21 ± 4.45; 42.79 ± 3.83; P = 0.519), body mass index (23.34 ± 3.69; 23.80 ± 3.78; P = 0.075), gestational age (38.96 ± 1.97; 38.77 ± 2.15; P = 0.207), maternal smoking (10.8%; 13.0%; P = 0.475), gestational diabetes (4.9%; 4.3% P = 0.854), preeclampsia (2.7%; 5.6%; P = 0.074), hypertensive disorders (3.3%; 2.3%; P = 0.494), maternal parity (multiparous 18.5%; 14.5%; P = 0.177) and liveborn gender (female 44.5%; 48.8%; P = 0.276) were not significantly different between fresh or vitrified–warmed groups. Endometrial thickness was significantly higher in the fresh versus vitrified–warmed group (8.83 ± 1.73 versus 8.57 ± 1.59; P = 0.035, respectively). Oocyte donor height was similar between the fresh versus vitrified–warmed group (163.22 ± 5.88 versus 164.27 ± 6.66 cm; P = 0.057, respectively). Mean birth weight was not significantly different (3239.21 ± 550.43; 3224.56 ± 570.83; adjusted P = 0.058). No differences were observed in macrosomia (7.1%; 6.3%; adjusted OR 0.857, 95% CI 0.314 to 2.340, P = 0.764), LGA (6.0%; 6.7%; adjusted OR 0.450, 95% CI 0.176 to 1.149, P = 0.095), pre-term birth (10.9%; 9.0% adjusted P = 0.997), very pre-term birth (0.8%; 1.3%; adjusted P = 1.000), extremely pre-term birth (0%; 1.0%; adjusted P = 0.998); underweight (10.0%; 7.0%; adjusted P = 0.050); very low weight (0.6; 1.1%; adjusted P = 1.000) and small for gestational age (1.9%; 0.7%; adjusted P = 0.974) between fresh or vitrified–warmed groups. ConclusionThis study eliminates potential confounders that might influence fetal growth and demonstrates that embryo vitrification and warming procedures do not affect birth weight.