Abstract
PurposeIntravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents are effective in the treatment of central involving diabetic macular oedema (DMO). Vitreoretinal interface abnormalities (VRIA) are common in patients with DMO, and the effect of these on the response to anti-VEGF treatment is unclear. Furthermore the effect of anti-VEGF agents on the VRIA itself is uncertain.MethodProspective study of consecutive patients treated with ranibizumab (RZB) for DMO as part of routine clinical care in one eye unit over a 1-year period. Visual acuity (Va), central retinal thickness (CRT) and injection frequency data was recorded on an electronic database. Treatment was initiated with four monthly RZB injections and then a monthly PRN regime. All patients underwent high-density spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SDOCT) at baseline and 12 months. The SDOCTs were graded by two observers masked to the outcome.ResultsOne hundred and four eyes (77 patients) were included in the analysis. The mean age was 62 years, and 62% were male. The mean presenting vision was 62 letters and CRT 472 μm. Eighty eyes retained stable Va, and 17 had an improvement in Va. At baseline, 39 eyes had associated focal vitreomacular adhesion (VMA) and by 12 months this reduced to 30 (p = 0.04), with 12 releasing VMA and three developing it. Patients with VMA had significantly better final Va than those without VMA. Improvement in CRT was greatest in those where VMA released during the study. Forty-five eyes had some degree of foveal involving epiretinal membrane (ERM) at baseline, and 28 were considered to have clinically significant ERM. There was no clinically relevant change in ERM during the study. Patients with significant ERM at baseline had a lower final vision. Multivariate analysis showed that ERM and more severe retinopathy at baseline were predictive of less visual improvement (p < 0.01). Shorter intraretinal cyst length, ERM and the absence of VMA at baseline were predictive of a worsened anatomical response (p < 0.001).ConclusionVRIA are related to outcome in patients treated with RZB. ERM was associated with a worsened visual and anatomic response, and VMA with an improved anatomical response particularly when spontaneous VMA release occurred during treatment. The presence and severity of ERM was not affected by RZB treatment.
Highlights
It is well known that there is a high prevalence of vitreoretinal interface abnormalities (VRIA) in patients with diabeticGraefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol (2017) 255:733–742 macular oedema
Multivariate analysis showed that epiretinal membrane (ERM) and more severe retinopathy at baseline were predictive of less visual improvement (p < 0.01)
We describe a significant influence of vitreoretinal interface abnormalities on anatomical and visual outcomes after intravitreal RZB in patients with diabetic macular oedema (DMO)
Summary
It is well known that there is a high prevalence of vitreoretinal interface abnormalities (VRIA) in patients with diabeticGraefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol (2017) 255:733–742 macular oedema Anti-VEGF agents have been shown to improve clinical outcomes in patients with centre involving DMO compared to laser [13]. The presence, of VRIA on the response to anti-VEGF agents in patients with DMO has had limited study, there is some data to suggest that they reduce the therapeutic effect [14]. These agents have been shown to alter the balance between angiogenic and fibrotic growth factors in patients with diabetic retinopathy, termed the angiofibrotic switch which can result in increased retinal traction in some patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) prior to surgery [15]
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.