Abstract

There is a growing body of evidence that numerical uncertainty expressions can be used by non-experts to improve decision quality. Moreover, there is some evidence that similar advantages extend to graphic expressions of uncertainty. However, visualizing uncertainty introduces challenges as well. Here, we discuss key misunderstandings that may arise from uncertainty visualizations, in particular the evidence that users sometimes fail to realize that the graphic depicts uncertainty. Instead they have a tendency to interpret the image as representing some deterministic quantity. We refer to this as thedeterministic construal error. Although there is now growing evidence for thedeterministic construal error, few studies are designed to detect it directly because they inform participants upfront that the visualization expresses uncertainty. In a natural setting such cues would be absent, perhaps making the deterministic assumption more likely. Here we discuss the psychological roots of this key but underappreciated misunderstanding as well as possible solutions. This is a critical question because it is now clear that members of the public understand that predictions involve uncertainty and have greater trust when uncertainty is included. Moreover, they can understand and use uncertainty predictions to tailor decisions to their own risk tolerance, as long as they are carefully expressed, taking into account the cognitive processes involved.

Highlights

  • Many of the important decisions that we face involve outcomes that are uncertain, such as how to protect oneself from the possibility of severe weather or infectious disease

  • As we all know “A picture is worth a thousand words”—or is it? The question we address here is whether uncertainty visualizations are more or less comprehensible to non-expert end-users than

  • We discovered the deterministic construal error (DCE) by accident when asking about the deterministic quantity depicted in the visualization that contained uncertainty

Read more

Summary

Frontiers in Computer Science

We discuss key misunderstandings that may arise from uncertainty visualizations, in particular the evidence that users sometimes fail to realize that the graphic depicts uncertainty. Instead they have a tendency to interpret the image as representing some deterministic quantity. There is growing evidence for the deterministic construal error, few studies are designed to detect it directly because they inform participants upfront that the visualization expresses uncertainty. We discuss the psychological roots of this key but underappreciated misunderstanding as well as possible solutions This is a critical question because it is clear that members of the public understand that predictions involve uncertainty and have greater trust when uncertainty is included.

INTRODUCTION
COMPARISON BETWEEN VISUALIZATIONS
COMPARISON BETWEEN VISUALIZATIONS AND NUMERICAL FORMATS
COMPARISON BETWEEN VISUALIZATIONS AND DETERMINISTIC FORMATS
INTERPRETATION BIASES ARISING FROM UNCERTAINTY VISUALIZATIONS
DETERMINISTIC CONSTRUAL ERROR
PSYCHOLOGICAL EXPLANATION
ASK THE RIGHT QUESTION
Findings
DISCUSSION

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.