Abstract
The Food Dignity project brought teams from five community-led organizations working on local food systems together with researchers from four academic institutions, to learn from community strategies for building sustainable local food systems and improving food justice. This reflective essay describes the emergence and refinement, within this context, of a values-driven methodology for surfacing, protecting, and conveying the strategic thinking and theories of change held by community practitioners. Knowledge utilization is too often viewed as a one-way street in which research-derived knowledge is expected to infuse and improve practice, without sufficient focus and mechanisms to ensure that practice-derived knowledge is valued and brought forward. Collaborative Pathway Modeling (CPM) addresses this gap by offering a practical tool for capturing and presenting practitioners’ theories of change. Importantly, the models that are produced are not just useful as tools for research. They have been valuable and useful to the community organizations themselves, underscoring a central commitment in CPM to equity and respect for community expertise and intellectual property. In this paper we describe the origins and development of CPM and its research-derived approach to program modeling, situate CPM relative to calls for greater community involvement in research, and present the values and process that define the methodology. We share stories from developing the community partner models, and conclude with reflections on the nature of the work and its larger potential for bringing forward essential diverse sources of knowledge in many arenas.
Highlights
Efforts to improve the strength, equity, and sustainability of community food systems—as with efforts to address many contemporary community problems—face a complex mix of systemic and local challenges
Researchers and funders in many fields have come to recognize the value of community expertise, as reflected in widespread calls for new or stronger practices such as community-academic partnerships, community-based participatory research (CBPR), and community involvement in research and implementation science (Ahmed & Palermo, 2010; Drahota et al, 2016; Green, 2001; Green & Mercer, 2001; Leviton & Trujillo, 2016; Lobb & Colditz, 2013; Pine & de Souza, 2013; Wallerstein & Duran, 2010; Wandersman, Alia, Cook, Hsu, & Ramaswamy, 2016)
The value that is added by participatory research is summarized well by Minkler (2005), who identifies numerous ways that the quality, relevance, and validity of research can be improved through CBPR
Summary
Submitted September 20, 2017 / Revised December 5, 2017, and February 23, 2018 / Accepted February 24, 2018 / Published online July 18, 2018.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.