Abstract

Location-based social networks (LBSNs) have rapidly prevailed in China with the increase in smart devices use, which has provided a wide range of opportunities to analyze urban behavior in terms of the use of LBSNs. In a LBSN, users socialize by sharing their location (also referred to as “geolocation”) in the form of a tweet (also referred to as a “check-in”), which contains information in the form of, but is not limited to, text, audio, video, etc., which records the visited place, movement patterns, and activities performed (e.g., eating, living, working, or leisure). Understanding the user’s activities and behavior in space and time using LBSN datasets can be achieved by archiving the daily activities, movement patterns, and social media behavior patterns, thus representing the user’s daily routine. The current research observing and analyzing urban activities behavior was often supported by the volunteered sharing of geolocation and the activity performed in space and time. The objective of this research was to observe the spatiotemporal and directional trends and the distribution differences of urban activities at the city and district levels using LBSN data. The density was estimated, and the spatiotemporal trend of activities was observed, using kernel density estimation (KDE); for spatial regression analysis, geographically weighted regression (GWR) analysis was used to observe the relationship between different activities in the study area. Finally, for the directional analysis, to observe the principle orientation and direction, and the spatiotemporal movement and extension trends, a standard deviational ellipse (SDE) analysis was used. The results of the study show that women were more inclined to use social media compared with men. However, the activities of male users were different during weekdays and weekends compared to those of female users. The results of the directional analysis at the district level reflect the change in the trajectory and spatiotemporal dynamics of activities. The directional analysis at the district level reveals its fine spatial structure in comparison to the whole city level. Therefore, LBSN can be considered as a supplementary and reliable source of social media big data for observing urban activities and behavior within a city in space and time.

Highlights

  • Social media has dramatically expanded in popularity around the world and produced a massive amount of social media big data with the association of a spatial context to check-ins and posts

  • We explored the Location-based social networks (LBSNs) data to observe urban activities behavior in space and time using Sina Weibo, the most famous Chinese microblog that is considered the Chinese version and replacement of Facebook launched by Sina Corporation [58] in 2009

  • We examined urban activities density to explore the spatiotemporal distribution of activities using kernel density estimation kernel density estimation (KDE)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Social media has dramatically expanded in popularity around the world and produced a massive amount of social media big data with the association of a spatial context (human dynamics and mobility behaviors within the urban context) to check-ins and posts. To study urban activities behavior, traditional methods (i.e., survey, census) [1,2] were adopted, but these methods are more expensive and laborious, and too often result in data sparsity, which in turn requires longer processing time. Due to these limitations, traditional methods are considered to be less effective for studying urban activities behavior. In LBSNs, users can announce their geolocation and activity performed based on the venue type and venue category as a check-in [5] This geolocation-based social media check-in phenomenon generates a massive amount of data, referred to as social media big data [6]. LBSN data, including geolocation, venue location, and venue type, are available at a much lower cost in comparison to the aforementioned traditional methods when observing and analyzing urban activities behavior

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call