Abstract

Purpose:The purpose of this study is to compare the visibility of microcalcifications of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) and full-field digital mammography (FFDM) using breast specimens.Materials And Methods:Thirty-one specimens’ DBT and FFDM were retrospectively reviewed by four readers.Results:The image quality of microcalcifications of DBT was rated as superior or equivalent in 71.0% by reader 1, 67.8% by reader 2, 64.5% by reader 3, and 80.6% by reader 4. The Fleiss kappa statistic for agreement among readers was 0.31.Conclusions:We suggest that image quality of DBT appears to be comparable with or better than FFDM in terms of revealing microcalcifications.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call