Visualization in 2D/3D registration matters for assuring technology-assisted image-guided surgery.

Abstract

Image-guided navigation and surgical robotics are the next frontiers of minimally invasive surgery. Assuring safety in high-stakes clinical environments is critical for their deployment. 2D/3D registration is an essential, enabling algorithm for most of these systems, as it provides spatial alignment of preoperative data with intraoperative images. While these algorithms have been studied widely, there is a need for verification methods to enable human stakeholders to assess and either approve or reject registration results to ensure safe operation. To address the verification problem from the perspective of human perception, we develop novel visualization paradigms and use a sampling method based on approximate posterior distribution to simulate registration offsets. We then conduct a user study with 22 participants to investigate how different visualization paradigms (Neutral, Attention-Guiding, Correspondence-Suggesting) affect human performance in evaluating the simulated 2D/3D registration results using 12 pelvic fluoroscopy images. All three visualization paradigms allow users to perform better than random guessing to differentiate between offsets of varying magnitude. The novel paradigms show better performance than the neutral paradigm when using an absolute threshold to differentiate acceptable and unacceptable registrations (highest accuracy: Correspondence-Suggesting (65.1%), highest F1 score: Attention-Guiding (65.7%)), as well as when using a paradigm-specific threshold for the same discrimination (highest accuracy: Attention-Guiding (70.4%), highest F1 score: Corresponding-Suggesting (65.0%)). This study demonstrates that visualization paradigms do affect the human-based assessment of 2D/3D registration errors. However, further exploration is needed to understand this effect better and develop more effective methods to assure accuracy. This research serves as a crucial step toward enhanced surgical autonomy and safety assurance in technology-assisted image-guided surgery.