Abstract

ABSTRACTThis study presents new ways of visualising technology-enhanced collaborative inquiry-based learning (CIBL) processes in an undergraduate physics course. The data included screen-capture videos from a technology-enhanced learning environment and audio recordings of discussions between students. We performed a thematic analysis based on the phases of inquiry-based learning (IBL). The thematic analysis was complemented by a content analysis, in which we analysed whether the utilisation of technological tools was on a deep-level, surface-level, or non-existent basis. Student participation was measured in terms of frequency of contributions as well as in terms of impact. We visualised the sequence of the face-to-face interactions of two groups of five students by focussing on the temporal aspects of IBL, technology enhancement and collaborative learning. First, instead of the amount of time the groups spent on a specific IBL phase, the between-group differences in the most frequent transitions between the IBL phases determined their differential progress in the CIBL process. Second, we found that the transitions were triggered by the groups’ ways of utilising technological tools either at the deep level or at the surface level. Finally, we found that the level of participation inequity remained stable throughout the CIBL process. As a result, only some of the members of the groups played a role in the most frequent transitions. Furthermore, this study reveals the need for scaffolds focussing on inquiry, technological and collaborative skills at the beginning of the learning process.

Highlights

  • It is widely accepted that in order to support twenty-first-century science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) learning, new ways of enhancing higher education practices ought to be found

  • We focus on the technology-enhanced collaborative inquiry-based learning (CIBL) processes of two different groups in their face-to-face study of the time-dependence of the displacement of an atom in a gas (Figure 1)

  • By means of visualisations, we identify the transitions between the inquiry-based learning (IBL) phases characterising the technology-enhanced CIBL processes of the groups

Read more

Summary

Introduction

It is widely accepted that in order to support twenty-first-century science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) learning, new ways of enhancing higher education practices ought to be found. IBL is guided by one or more research questions provided by a teacher or proposed by students (Lazonder & Harmsen, 2016). The IBL process can be divided into five phases: (1) orientate, (2) conceptualise, (3) investigate, (4) conclude and (5) discuss and review findings and conclusions as well as formulate suggestions for the step. These five phases form the inquiry cycle, which engages students in an authentic scientific process (Pedaste et al, 2015)

Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.