Visual versus quantitative assessments using Pittsburgh compound‐B and Flutemetamol PET scans across age groups

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundBoth 11C‐Pittsburgh compound‐B (PiB) and 18F‐Flutemetamol (FMT) have off‐target white matter (WM) signal that increases with age, but WM uptake is stronger with FMT than PiB. Although their WM patterns are comparably associated with age, the difference between them may impact visual and quantitative assessments of cortical amyloid‐β uptake. Our objective was to determine whether PiB PET and FMT PET visual assessments agree with quantitative cortical amyloid‐β evaluations.MethodA cohort of cognitively unimpaired (CU) younger adults with median (range) of 39 (30, 48) years (N = 30), CU older adults with age of 67 (61, 83) years (N = 30) and older adults with AD dementia with age of 67 (54‐84) years (N = 23) underwent MRI, PiB PET and FMT PET. PiB‐PET and FMT PET scans were evaluated visually by two nuclear medicine specialists blinded to participant information. Disagreements were reconciled with a second, joint round of visual reads. Readers applied standard visual assessment criteria using the absence of regional gray matter (GM) and WM contrast as an indication of a positive scan. The global cortical PiB standard uptake value ratio (SUVr) was obtained referencing to cerebellar crus uptake and converted to centiloid values. Participants were classified as PiB positive/negative using a centiloid cut‐off of 22.ResultPiB and FMT visual positivity agreed with quantitative positivity on PiB‐based centiloid values in 69/83 for PiB and 78/83 for FMT. There were 10 disagreements with PiB, 1 disagreement with FMT and 4 disagreements with both. Few disagreements occurred near the centiloid threshold. Interestingly, all disagreements between visual reads (amyloid‐β positive) and centiloid (amyloid‐β negative) in the CU younger were with PiB. FMT disagreements were always in the CU older and AD groups.ConclusionDisagreements between amyloid‐β positivity on visual reads and quantitative measurements (centiloid) may depend on age and tracer. PiB WM uptake is lower than FMT WM uptake, which may lead to reduced contrast between GM and WM (part of the standard criteria for visual reads), especially in younger ages. In contrast, WM uptake increases at older ages, and increased WM signal may bleed more into cortical regions, hiding subtle, near‐threshold cortical uptake, especially with FMT.