Abstract

Although good visual memory is frequently cited as an essential requirement for competent spelling, there is little empirical evidence to support this. In this paper visual sequential memory was studied in two separate controlled experiments which compared the test performances of 13‐year‐old poor spellers and controls. Test materials were carefully designed to obtain a measure of visual memory with minimal interference from verbal coding. With the variable of IQ controlled for, visual memory did not appear to differentiate between the groups unless mediated by verbal coding.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call