Abstract

The visual search performance of radiologists is systematically challenged due to the use of flat-panel displays when viewing multi-slice images. Three-dimensional visualization of information is expected to facilitate visual search for radiologists. However, as the differences in user performance, depending on radiologist experience, have not yet been assessed for real three-dimensional images, it is difficult to estimate the usability of new visualization systems for radiologists with different amounts of professional search experience. In this study, we aimed to determine how three-dimensional visual search is affected by radiologist experience and the physical properties of stimuli. Radiologists, residents, and medical students accomplished visual search tasks with varying set sizes and target-distractor similarities. Search items were presented on multiple display planes and image manipulation was conducted using a computer keyboard. We compared the search outcome and strategy among three groups of participants. All three groups submitted a similar number of correct responses depending on target-distractor similarity. However, in contrast to radiologists and residents, it took a considerably longer time for students to find the targets. The major differences were evident in search strategy when comparing the image manipulations of radiologists with those of residents and students. Our results demonstrated that experienced radiologists’ search performance benefited from seeing the entire three-dimensional view of an image, whereas residents and students focused instead on reducing the amount of information and searched in a selective manner. These findings should be taken into account when planning the implementation of new workstations with three-dimensional visualization in radiology.

Highlights

  • Due to rapid changes in medical imaging technologies, a vast amount of visual information is available to radiologists in the form of multi-slice images on flat-panel displays [1,2,3,4]

  • We briefly outlined a demand for three-dimensional visualization systems in diagnostic radiology and visualization methods that were proposed for the implementation

  • The lack of experimental evaluation for specific user performance constrains the further implementation of new visualization devices for professional purposes

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Due to rapid changes in medical imaging technologies, a vast amount of visual information is available to radiologists in the form of multi-slice images on flat-panel displays [1,2,3,4]. Numerous cross-sections of anatomical structures ensure a more detailed and comprehensive representation of visual information when compared to X-ray images [3,5], the complexity of three-dimensional visualization comes with benefits and costs. Sci. 2019, 9, 4929 other hand, the limited processing capacity of the human visual system [7] is systematically challenged by the presentation of complex visual information on flat-panel displays. Radiologists experience high cognitive load with increased human-computer interaction [8], which may negatively influence decision-making accuracy [9]. The current situation leads to growing interest in improving visual ergonomics in radiology with the help of new visualization methods that would provide medical professionals with a three-dimensional representation of information

Objectives
Methods
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call