Abstract

This study examined how the contents and timing of a visual stimulus affect the identification of mixed sounds recorded in a daily life environment. For experiments, we presented four environment sounds as auditory stimuli for 5 s along with a picture or a written word as a visual stimulus that might or might not denote the source of one of the four sounds. Three conditions of temporal relations between the visual stimuli and sounds were used. The visual stimulus was presented either: (a) for 5 s simultaneously with the sound; (b) for 5 s, 1 s before the sound (SOA between the audio and visual stimuli was 6 s); or (c) for 33 ms, 1 s before the sound (SOA was 1033 ms). Participants reported all identifiable sounds for those audio–visual stimuli. To characterize the effects of visual stimuli on sound identification, the following were used: the identification rates of sounds for which the visual stimulus denoted its sound source, the rates of other sounds for which the visual stimulus did not denote the sound source, and the frequency of false hearing of a sound that was not presented for each sound set. Results of the four experiments demonstrated that a picture or a written word promoted identification of the sound when it was related to the sound, particularly when the visual stimulus was presented for 5 s simultaneously with the sounds. However, a visual stimulus preceding the sounds had a benefit only for the picture, not for the written word. Furthermore, presentation with a picture denoting a sound simultaneously with the sound reduced the frequency of false hearing. These results suggest three ways that presenting a visual stimulus affects identification of the auditory stimulus. First, activation of the visual representation extracted directly from the picture promotes identification of the denoted sound and suppresses the processing of sounds for which the visual stimulus did not denote the sound source. Second, effects based on processing of the conceptual information promote identification of the denoted sound and suppress the processing of sounds for which the visual stimulus did not denote the sound source. Third, processing of the concurrent visual representation suppresses false hearing.

Highlights

  • Many studies have been conducted to ascertain how auditory and visual modalities mutually interact

  • This study examines the interaction under the multiple-stimulus condition and investigates how visual processing facilitates or interferes with auditory processing when the visual stimulus is relevant or irrelevant to the auditory stimuli

  • To elucidate how visual processing affects the identification of auditory stimuli, this study examined the effect of a visual stimulus on auditory processing with visual stimuli of different types and with various temporal relations between the visual and auditory stimuli in four experiments

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Many studies have been conducted to ascertain how auditory and visual modalities mutually interact. Different studies have demonstrated that audition can modify vision through duration perception (Walker and Scott, 1981), frequency perception (Welch et al, 1986; Shams et al, 2000, 2002; Wada et al, 2003; McCormick and Mammasian, 2008), and apparent motion (Kamitani and Shimojo, 2001; Wada et al, 2003; Ichikawa and Masakura, 2006) These results of studies suggest that the dominant modality in interaction between auditory and visual processing depends upon whether a participant judges the spatial or temporal aspect of the stimulus (Shimojo and Shams, 2001). Recent Bayesian models (e.g., Battaglia et al, 2003; Ernst, 2006) show that dominance of a modality in audio–visual interaction can be expected to result from experience related to the reliability of each modality in our daily life

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call