Abstract

To evaluate visual performance and optical quality of an extended depth-of-focus intraocular lens (EDoF IOL) compared with a monofocal aspheric IOL. Department of Ophthalmology, Charité-Medical University Berlin, Germany. Prospective case series. After phacoemulsification, a total of 28 patients (56 eyes) underwent bilateral implantation of either the Mini Well (EDoF IOL) or the Mini 4 (monofocal IOL). Assessments including refraction, distance, intermediate and near visual acuity, defocus curves, contrast sensitivity, glare disability, higher-order aberrations (HOAs), and patient satisfaction were performed at 1 month and 3 months postoperatively. Both study groups comprised 14 patients (28 eyes) each. At 3-month follow-up, the EDoF IOL showed better results in monocular uncorrected intermediate visual acuity (-0.04 vs 0.10 logMAR, P = .000) and in uncorrected near visual acuity (0.13 vs 0.36 logMAR, P = .000), whereas no statistically significant difference was found between groups in monocular uncorrected distance visual acuity (0.04 vs 0.00 logMAR, P = .110). The monocular depth of focus was 0.8 D greater in the Mini Well IOL group. Measurements of internal HOAs revealed a greater negative primary spherical aberration in the EDoF group at pupil sizes of 2.0 to 5.0 mm. At 5.0 mm, total internal HOAs did not differ statistically significantly (0.376 vs 0.340 μm root mean square, P = .068). The Mini Well IOL provided greater depth of focus with superior outcomes at intermediate and near distances and comparable outcomes at far distance. Although inducing higher amounts of spherical aberration, it showed good results under low lighting conditions with little subjective dysphotopsia.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.