Abstract

The significant reduction in heavy oil viscosity when mixed with hbox {CO}_{2} is well documented. However, for hbox {CO}_{2} injection to be an efficient method for improving heavy oil recovery, other mechanisms are required to improve the mobility ratio between the hbox {CO}_{2} front and the resident heavy oil. In situ generation of hbox {CO}_{2}-foam can improve hbox {CO}_{2} injection performance by (a) increasing the effective viscosity of hbox {CO}_{2} in the reservoir and (b) increasing the contact area between the heavy oil and injected hbox {CO}_{2} and hence improving hbox {CO}_{2} dissolution rate. However, in situ generation of stable hbox {CO}_{2}-foam capable of travelling from the injection well to the production well is hard to achieve. We have previously published the results of a series of foam stability experiments using alkali and in the presence of heavy crude oil (Farzaneh and Sohrabi 2015). The results showed that stability of hbox {CO}_{2}-foam decreased by addition of NaOH, while it increased by addition of hbox {Na}_{2}hbox {CO}_{3}. However, the highest increase in hbox {CO}_{2}-foam stability was achieved by adding borate to the surfactant solution. Borate is a mild alkaline with an excellent pH buffering ability. The previous study was performed in a foam column in the absence of a porous medium. In this paper, we present the results of a new series of experiments carried out in a high-pressure glass micromodel to visually investigate the performance of borate–surfactant hbox {CO}_{2}-foam injection in an extra-heavy crude oil in a transparent porous medium. In the first part of the paper, the pore-scale interactions of hbox {CO}_{2}-foam and extra-heavy oil and the mechanisms of oil displacement and hence oil recovery are presented through image analysis of micromodel images. The results show that very high oil recovery was achieved by co-injection of the borate–surfactant solution with hbox {CO}_{2}, due to in-situ formation of stable foam. Dissolution of hbox {CO}_{2} in heavy oil resulted in significant reduction in its viscosity. hbox {CO}_{2}-foam significantly increased the contact area between the oil and hbox {CO}_{2} significantly and thus the efficiency of the process. The synergy effect between the borate and surfactant resulted in (1) alteration of the wettability of the porous medium towards water wet and (2) significant reduction of the oil–water IFT. As a result, a bank of oil-in-water (O/W) emulsion was formed in the porous medium and moved ahead of the hbox {CO}_{2}-foam front. The in-situ generated O/W emulsion has a much lower viscosity than the original oil and plays a major role in the observed additional oil recovery in the range of performed experiments. Borate also made hbox {CO}_{2}-foam more stable by changing the system to non-spreading oil and reducing coalescence of the foam bubbles. The results of these visual experiments suggest that borate can be a useful additive for improving heavy oil recovery in the range of the performed tests, by increasing hbox {CO}_{2}-foam stability and producing O/W emulsions.

Highlights

  • The total volume of heavy in-place oil resources, extra-heavy oils and tar sands identified on the planet has been estimated at 2200–3700 billion barrels (Huc 2011)

  • Since the previous study was performed in a foam column in the absence of a porous medium, in this paper, we present the results of a new series of experiments carried out in a high-pressure glass micromodel to visually investigate the performance of borate–surfactant CO2-foam injection in an extra-heavy crude oil in a transparent porous medium

  • As CO2 and the AS solutions entered the porous medium, the following events were observed: firstly, some of the residual oil was displaced by the flowing CO2

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The total volume of heavy in-place oil resources, extra-heavy oils and tar sands identified on the planet has been estimated at 2200–3700 billion barrels (Huc 2011). The production of heavy and extra-heavy oils is on the rise, driven by ever increasing global energy consumption, rapid decline in the availability of light crude oils, and high oil prices. Thermal processes are usually applied to these reservoirs to enhance recovery by reducing the oil viscosity (Upreti and Lohi 2007). The majority of these thermal methods are a form of steam injection with cyclic steam stimulation (CSS) being one of the most successful of these techniques. Thermal methods are energy intensive, with a large carbon footprint and negative environmental impact due to their significant CO2 production. There is, a need for developing non-thermal methods that can efficiently increase heavy oil recovery as an alternative to thermal methods

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call