Abstract

To compare efficacy and safety of visual internal urethrotomy (VIU) using holmium laser (Ho:YAG) (group A) versus cold knife (group B) in children with urethral strictures. It may be the first comparative study on this issue in children. This study compared Ho:YAG group, which was evaluated prospectively from January 2014 till January 2016, versus cold knife group, which was a historical control performed from March 2008 till February 2010. Children ≤13years old with urethral strictures ≤1.5cm were included successively. Recurrent cases, congenital obstructions and cases with complete arrest of dye in voiding cystourethrography were excluded. Scar tissue was incised at twelve o'clock. Outcome was compared using Student's t, Mann-Whitney, Chi-square or Fisher exact tests as appropriate. Each group included 21 patients. Mean age was 6.27±3.23 (2-13) years old. Mean stricture length was 1.02 versus 1cm in group A versus B, respectively (p=0.862). Ten cases of penile/bulbous strictures and another 11 cases of membranous strictures were found in each group. There was no significant difference between both groups in preoperative data. Success rate for initial VIU was 66.7% in group A versus 38% in group B (p=0.064). This was associated with significantly higher Qmax in group A (mean 16.52 vs 12.09ml/s; p=0.03). Success rate after two trials of VIU was 76.2% for group A and 47.61% for group B (p=0.057). No complications were reported in both groups. Laser VIU has a higher success rate than cold knife VIU for urethral strictures ≤1.5cm in children with significantly higher Qmax. Both are easy to perform, low invasive and safe.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.