Abstract
Research indicates that perceivers (both adult and infant) are universally biased to attend to vowels with extreme articulatory/acoustic properties (peripheral in F1/F2 vowel space). Yet, the nature of this perceptual phenomenon (i.e., the natural referent vowel [NRV] bias) is not fully understood. The present research investigates whether this bias is attributable to general auditory processes or to phonetic processes that track articulatory information available across modalities. In experiment 1, we examined whether adult perceivers are biased to attend to visual information that specifies extreme vocalic articulations. As predicted by the phonetic account, we found a bias favoring relatively more peripheral vowels when only acoustic or only visual speech information was present. In experiment 2, we investigated how the integration of acoustic and visual speech cues influence the effects documented in experiment 1. When acoustic and visual cues were phonetically congruent, a peripheral vowel bias was observed. In contrast, when acoustic and visual cues were phonetically incongruent, this bias was disrupted. Collectively, these results are compatible with the view that the NRV bias is phonetic in nature—the speech processing system appears to be biased toward extreme vocalic gestures, which may be specified in the optic, as well as in the acoustic, signal.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.