Abstract
An overview of“visual form” theories and concurrent research is briefly presented. It is demonstrated that terms used are either implicitly defined or that authors employ collections of synonyms. The result is confusion over what is meant by“visual form” within and between groups of theorists and researchers, as well as within specialized areas and the field of vision research in general. This overview is followed by (a) an explanation why“visual form” is presently“undefined,” (b) discrete definitions of historically persistent terms, and (c) a plan for establishing a standardized vocabulary in scientific psychology.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
