Abstract

The between-hand interference during bimanual tasks is a consequence of the connection between the neural controllers of movement. Previous studies showed the existence of an asymmetric between-hand interference (caused by neural crosstalk) when different kinematics plans were to be executed by each hand or when only one was visually guided and received perturbed visual feedback. Here, in continuous bimanual circle drawing tasks, we investigated if the central nervous system (CNS) can benefit from visual composite feedback, i.e., a weighted sum of hands' positions presented for the visually-guided hand, to control the non-visible hand. Our results demonstrated improvement in the non-visible non-dominant hand (NDH) performance in the presence of the composite feedback. When NDH was visually guided, the dominant hand's (DH) performance during asymmetric drawing deteriorated, while its performance during symmetric drawing improved. This indicates that the CNS's ability to leverage composite feedback, which can be the result of decoding the non-visible hand positional information from the composite feedback, is task-dependent and can be asymmetric. Also, the non-visible hand's performance degraded when DH or NDH was visually guided with amplified error feedback. The results of the amplified feedback condition do not strongly support the asymmetry of the interference during asymmetric circle drawing. Comparing muscle activations in the asymmetric experiment, we concluded that the observed kinematic differences were not due to alternation in muscle co-contractions.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call