Visual Cognitive Assessment Test (VCAT): Utility in detecting early dementia in diverse language cohorts

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundCognitive tests play a crucial role in evaluating mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia. As most tests are originally developed in English‐speaking cohorts, their application in multilingual populations will need to be translated and may affect the test psychometrics. Therefore, the VCAT was developed as a language‐neutral visual‐based assessment to mitigate this issue. Although the VCAT has been validated in Southeast Asian countries, its performance in wider language cohorts remains unclear. Here, we aim to compare the utility of VCAT with established screening tests, Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and Mini‐Mental State Examination (MMSE), in distinguishing MCI and dementia from cognitively normal (CN) individuals in a multinational study.MethodThis collaboration between Canada, China, India, Korea and Singapore recruited 614 participants (306 CN, 212 MCI, 94 Dementia). The administration of the cognitive tests were standardized across all study sites. Participants underwent the MMSE, MoCA, and VCAT on the same day, with their scores and demographic data (age, gender, years of education, ethnicity, primary written and spoken language) collected in the centers respectively. The performance of VCAT in distinguishing MCI and dementia from CN were assessed within each sites using the area under the curve (AUC).ResultBaseline demographics of the participants in each site were summarized in Table 1. The mean (SD) MMSE, MoCA and VCAT scores in each diagnostic group across all countries were summarized in Table 2. The mean (SD) VCAT scores across all countries for CN, MCI and dementia were 25.91 (3.14); 21.00 (5.36) and 11.91 (4.79) respectively. Corresponding scores for MoCA were 26.09 (2.76); 22.62 (4.43); 14.02 (5.17) and corresponding scores for MMSE were 28.34 (1.79); 26.55 (2.90); 18.91 (4.81). The AUC of VCAT in detecting cognitive impairment (MCI+Dementia) was found to be 0.83 (95%CI 0.80 to 0.86), which is comparable to the MoCA 0.82 (95%CI 0.78 to 0.85) and the MMSE 0.78 (95%CI 0.74 to 0.81).ConclusionVCAT was comparable to the MoCA and MMSE in distinguishing cognitive impairment from CN in a multinational, multilingual population. Further studies with wider language populations are needed to further validate the utility of VCAT globally.