Abstract

The distinction between phenomenal and access consciousness has been influential in the field of consciousness studies. Both Block and Lamme proposed that access consciousness, or narrow cognitive accessibility, is related to a limited capacity working memory, and that phenomenal consciousness, or broad cognitive accessibility, is related to iconic memory or, more recently, to a fragile (intermediate) short-term memory store with a larger capacity than working memory. They have also highlighted the preattentive nature of phenomenal consciousness and of the related iconic and fragile visual short-term stores, thus selectively linking attention with access consciousness, in line with Baars and Dehaene, among others. However, a range of electrophysiological and neurophysiological studies suggest that visual attention can affect early responses of neurons in visual cortex, before conscious access. Furthermore, some theories and neurocomputational models suggest earlier attentional biases related to phenomenal consciousness. To solve this controversy, and to shed light on the relationships of attention with iconic memory and subsequent stages of visual maintenance, we conducted an experiment with a novel procedure of change detection based on delayed cueing of the target for report with high- and low-priority objects marked by color. In line with our hypothesis, the results show an attentional bias toward high-priority objects in the memory array with the longer (600 and 1,200 ms) cueing delays associated with a fragile (intermediate) visual short-term memory, but not with the shorter cueing delays (16.6 and 200 ms) associated with iconic memory. These findings therefore suggest two stages of phenomenal consciousness before access consciousness: a first preattentive stage related to iconic memory and a second stage related to fragile visual short-term memory intermediate between iconic and visual working memory, which is modulated by visual attention in a time-dependent manner. Finally, our results suggest the dissociation between a mid-level visual attention modulating phenomenal consciousness and a central attention directing access consciousness.

Highlights

  • Phenomenal and Access ConsciousnessNed Block proposed the influential distinction between phenomenal and access consciousness (Block, 1995, 2005)

  • In order to test the prediction derived from Theory of Attention and Consciousness (TAC) and earlier neurocomputational models (Raffone and Pantani, 2010; Simione et al, 2012) and contribute to an increased understanding of the relationships between visual attention and phenomenal consciousness, we designed a behavioral experiment based on the revised change detection procedure of Landman et al (2003) on the basic visual working memory task proposed by Luck and Vogel (1997)

  • We originally addressed the interaction of visual attention with different stages of visual processing and storage, with relevance to characterize the role of attention at different stages of phenomenal consciousness, before access consciousness

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Ned Block proposed the influential distinction between phenomenal and access consciousness (Block, 1995, 2005). Block (2007) further suggested that phenomenal consciousness is linked with the notion of broad cognitive accessibility, an intermediate level of representation between the unconscious level and access consciousness, with the latter related to narrow cognitive accessibility. These three sets of information are related to the taxonomy proposed by Dehaene and Naccache (2001, see Dehaene et al, 2006), in which some information encoded in the nervous system is inaccessible to a conscious level (set I1), other information is potentially accessible in the global workspace for conscious access, as it can be consciously amplified if it is attended to (set I2), with only one selected content (object) of the latter being at any one time accessed in the workspace for conscious access (set I3). Unlike Block, Dehaene and Naccache regard the intermediate set I2 in terms of preconscious representations rather than phenomenally conscious contents with broad cognitive accessibility

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call