Abstract

Spatial terms such as “above”, “in front of”, and “on the left of” are all essential for describing the location of one object relative to another object in everyday communication. Apprehending such spatial relations involves relating linguistic to object representations by means of attention. This requires at least one attentional shift, and models such as the Attentional Vector Sum (AVS) predict the direction of that attention shift, from the sausage to the box for spatial utterances such as “The box is above the sausage”. To the extent that this prediction generalizes to overt gaze shifts, a listener’s visual attention should shift from the sausage to the box. However, listeners tend to rapidly look at referents in their order of mention and even anticipate them based on linguistic cues, a behavior that predicts a converse attentional shift from the box to the sausage. Four eye-tracking experiments assessed the role of overt attention in spatial language comprehension by examining to which extent visual attention is guided by words in the utterance and to which extent it also shifts “against the grain” of the unfolding sentence. The outcome suggests that comprehenders’ visual attention is predominantly guided by their interpretation of the spatial description. Visual shifts against the grain occurred only when comprehenders had some extra time, and their absence did not affect comprehension accuracy. However, the timing of this reverse gaze shift on a trial correlated with that trial’s verification time. Thus, while the timing of these gaze shifts is subtly related to the verification time, their presence is not necessary for successful verification of spatial relations.

Highlights

  • In everyday communication we are exchanging spatial information about our environment via what has been dubbed spatial language

  • Eye movements The analysis revealed a significant intercept (Estimated coefficientss = 0.76, t = 2.73, p < .01; Estimated coefficientitem = 0.87, t = 1.93, p = .055) with a positive value, suggesting that the inspections after once looking at the reference object were mostly directed towards the located object

  • The first inspection after one inspection to the reference object was directed to the located object

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In everyday communication we are exchanging spatial information about our environment via what has been dubbed spatial language. In the spatial description “The box is above the sausage”, the location of the sausage (the reference object) [1], [2] narrows the domain in which to search for the box (the located object) [3], [4]. The spatial preposition “above” defines the relation between the sausage and the box. While we know that its interpretation engages attentional resources [5], [6], we do not know how precisely visual attention is deployed during the online comprehension of sentences about spatial relations PLOS ONE | DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0115758 January 21, 2015

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.