Abstract
Most spirometry errors reduce test results. The aim of the study was comparison results of spirometry performed with the ATS/ERS quantitative criteria and simple visual inspection criteria. 75 patients performed spirometry twice on the same day: according to criteria of the ATS/ERS quality for spirometry and on visual control. Statistical analysis was performed with Bland-Altman method. Forced expiratory volume (FVC) and forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) were greater for the cases with quantitative control. The mean difference between FVCs was 0.37 ± 0.29 L. The mean difference between FEV1s was 0.06 ± 0.2 L. Using ATS/ERS spirometry guide-lines may help improve results and avoids spirometry errors.
Highlights
comparison results of spirometry performed with the ATS
Statistical analysis was performed with Bland-Altman method
Серия «Современная функциональная диагностика». — 2019. — Т. 2. — 15 (387). — С. 13–16
Summary
Л. А. Попова, к. м. н., с. н. с. клинико-диагностического отдела, врач отделение функциональной диагностики Е.А., Шергина, к. м. н., зав. отделением функциональной диагностики клинико-диагностического отдела М. И. Чушкин, д. м. н., в. н. с. клинико-диагностического отдела
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
