Abstract

Thirty-six 3- and 4-year-old children were tested on delayed visual and haptic recognition of nonsense shapes under intramodal, crossmodal, and concomitant input conditions in an Age (2) × Standard (3) × Recognition test (2) analysis of variance design. Age, Standard and. Recognition modes were significant effects, and there was a significant Standard × Recognition test interaction. The visual modality was superior to the haptic under all possible comparisons: Standard, recognition, and intramodal. An Age × Standard × Recognition interaction was also found. Visual recognition was not improved when haptic cues were added, but haptic recognition by 4 year olds was improved when visual cues were added. The latter did not occur for 3 year olds who performed at chance level on haptic tasks.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.