Abstract

As people age, they tend to integrate successive visual stimuli over longer intervals than younger adults. It may be expected that temporal integration is affected similarly in other modalities, possibly due to general, age-related cognitive slowing of the brain. However, the previous literature does not provide convincing evidence that this is the case in audition. One hypothesis is that the primacy of time in audition attenuates the degree to which temporal integration in that modality extends over time as a function of age. We sought to settle this issue by comparing visual and auditory temporal integration in younger and older adults directly, achieved by minimizing task differences between modalities. Participants were presented with a visual or an auditory rapid serial presentation task, at 40–100 ms/item. In both tasks, two subsequent targets were to be identified. Critically, these could be perceptually integrated and reported by the participants as such, providing a direct measure of temporal integration. In both tasks, older participants integrated more than younger adults, especially when stimuli were presented across longer time intervals. This difference was more pronounced in vision and only marginally significant in audition. We conclude that temporal integration increases with age in both modalities, but that this change might be slightly less pronounced in audition.

Highlights

  • Stimuli that rapidly succeed one after another can be perceived as a single composite stimulus and/or event

  • An additional analysis for Lag 1 only (WCM = unstructured, a = 3.029) showed that stimulus duration was a significant factor, v2(2, N = 114) = 68.9, p \ 0.001, which indicates that shorter stimulus durations resulted in more reports of strict integrations

  • Older adults were more influenced by stimulus duration than young adults, revealed by an interaction effect of group*duration, v2(2, N = 114) = 26.7, p \ 0.001, meaning that older adults integrated more often than young adults at longer stimulus durations

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Stimuli that rapidly succeed one after another can be perceived as a single composite stimulus and/or event. For example, rapid, successive still images are perceived as fluent motion. This is due to a perceptual process named temporal integration, which combines stimuli within an interval up to about 200 ms into an aggregated representation (Hogben & Di Lollo, 1974; Di Lollo, 1980). The duration of the interval varies from person to person, and factors that affect cognitive functioning can play a role therein. A person’s age, can be an important factor, since aging results in an overall decline or slowing down of the cognitive system (Salthouse, 1996). How aging affects temporal integration is not yet fully known

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call