Abstract
We examined whether the use of visual abstracts on social media platforms can improve comprehensive social media and conventional metrics such as total altmetric attention score, full text page views and citation counts (study outcomes) through retrospective cohort study. We included all original research articles (Total 307 articles: N=69 in visual abstract group and N=238 in control group) published between July 2018 and January 2019 in the JAMA, BMJ and the NEJM and used negative binomial regression to adjust for article characteristics. Adjusted analysis showed no significant differences between articles with and without visual abstracts in the altmetric attention score (p=0.37) and in number of page views (p=0.44). Citations in the Web of Science core collection were found to be statistically significant favouring control group (p=0.028). We also found no significant differences in altmetric attention score and page views after stratification for article type [randomised controlled trial (RCT) vs. non-RCT]. Citations counts were found to be borderline significant for RCT (p=0.04) and non-significant for non-RCT. Visual abstracts might not be effective in disseminating scientific research. We should look at other innovative ways to improve the visibility of the research.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
