Abstract
The one-dimensional viscous conservation law is considered on the whole line u t + f ( u ) x = ε u x x , ( x , t ) ∈ R × R + ¯ , ε > 0 , \begin{equation*} u_t + f(u)_x=\varepsilon u_{xx},\quad (x,t)\in \mathbb {R}\times \overline {\mathbb {R}_{+}},\quad \varepsilon >0, \end{equation*} subject to positive measure initial data. The flux f ∈ C 1 ( R ) f\in C^1(\mathbb {R}) is assumed to satisfy a p − p- condition, a weak form of convexity. In particular, any flux of the form f ( u ) = ∑ i = 1 J a i u m i f(u)=\sum _{i=1}^Ja_iu^{m_i} is admissible if a i > 0 , m i > 1 , i = 1 , 2 , … , J . a_i>0,\,m_i>1,\,\,i=1,2,\ldots ,J. The only case treated hitherto in the literature is f ( u ) = u m f(u)=u^m [Arch. Rat. Mech. Anal. 124 (1993), pp. 43–65] and the initial data is a “single source”, namely, a multiple of the delta function. The corresponding solutions have been labeled as “source-type” and the treatment made substantial use of the special form of both the flux and the initial data. In this paper existence and uniqueness of solutions is established. The method of proof relies on sharp decay estimates for the viscous Hamilton-Jacobi equation. Some estimates are independent of the viscosity coefficient, thus leading to new estimates for the (inviscid) hyperbolic conservation law.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.