Viscosity‐reducing effects of two semiflexible liquid‐crystalline polyesters with different chain rigidities in a matrix of polycarbonate

Abstract

AbstractTwo liquid‐crystalline polyesters (LCPs) with different chain rigidities were synthesized and melt‐blended with polycarbonate (PC) at an LCP concentration of 2 wt %. The first LCP (LCP1) was based on hydroxybenzoic acid (HBA), hydroquinone (HQ), sebacic acid (SEA), and suberic acid (SUA) and contained a relatively high concentration of flexible units (SEA and SUA). The other one (LCP2) was based on HBA, hydroxynaphthoic acid, HQ, and SEA and contained a lower concentration of flexible units. LCP2 had a much lower melting point, a higher clearing temperature, and a lower shear viscosity than LCP1. The blending was carried out at 265, 280, and 300°C for both systems. The extent of the viscosity reduction induced by the addition of LCP1 depended on the compounding temperature, and the lowest viscosity was achieved with blending at 280°C. This was attributed to the large interfacial area and interactions between the flexible segments of LCP1 and PC chains at the interface. For PC/LCP2, the viscosity reduction was not significantly dependent on the compounding temperature, and when it was compounded at 280°C, its viscosity was significantly higher than that of PC/LCP1 at high shear rates, even though LCP2 had lower viscosity. A scanning electron microscopy study revealed that, with compounding at 265 and 280°C, LCP2 was poorly dispersed in the PC matrix in comparison with LCP1, and the glass‐transition‐temperature depression caused by the addition of LCP2 was relatively small. This indicated that interfacial interactions in PC/LCP2 were weaker, thereby explaining their different rheological behavior in comparison with PC/LCP1. With compounding at 300°C, the compatibility of both systems improved because of transesterification reactions, but this did not lead to a lower viscosity because of the lack of physical interfacial interactions. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 92: 960–969, 2004