Abstract

The New Austrian Tunneling Method (NATM) essentially rests on observational information concerning displacements measured in selected positions at the inner surface of shotcrete tunnel shells. The combination of these measurements with advanced material and structural mechanics, in the course of so-called hybrid methods, have successfully delivered, for more than 20 years, practically relevant estimations of internal and external forces and corresponding degrees of utilization. The reliability of the latter, however, may crucially depend on the used material model. Based on a recently proposed analytical structural mechanics model [Acta Mech 233, 2989–3019 (2022)], and focusing on the benchmark example of measurement cross section MC1452 of the Sieberg tunnel, driven in the 1990s in Miocene clay marl, the present paper compares the estimations of forces and degrees of utilization arising from differently refined constitutive concepts, namely (i) aging elasticity, (ii) aging linear viscoelasticity, and (iii) aging nonlinear viscoelasticity. It turns out that only the consideration of aging nonlinear viscoelastic material behavior provides access to realistic values for the degree of utilization, being lower than one. Simpler material models would indicate local material failure, which was not observed in situ.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call