Abstract

Objective:Experimental endotoxaemia induces subcutaneous adipose tissue inflammation and systemic insulin resistance in lean subjects. Glyceroneogenesis, by limiting free fatty acids (FFA) release from adipocytes, controls FFA homoeostasis and systemic insulin sensitivity. The roles of subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) and visceral adipose tissue (VAT) in metabolic deregulation are intrinsically different. We compared the effect of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) on the inflammation profiles of SAT and VAT explants from lean women, as well as on glyceroneogenesis, to test whether these two fat depots have intrinsically different responses to this metabolic endotoxin.Design:Abdominal SAT and VAT explants from eight lean women were treated in vitro with LPS. Their inflammatory status was evaluated by cytokine gene expression and secretion; glyceroneogenesis was evaluated by cytosolic phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase activity and FFA vs glycerol release.Results:In the basal state, the cytokine status and expression of macrophage markers were lower in SAT than VAT. In the presence of 100 ng ml−1 LPS, SAT exhibited a strong inflammatory response (increased interleukin-6 and tumor necrosis factor-α expression) and increased release of FFA due to inhibition of glyceroneogenesis, whereas VAT was only mildly affected. The effects of LPS on both tissues were blocked by the nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) inhibitor, parthenolide. A significant effect of LPS on VAT occurred only at 1 μg ml−1 LPS.Conclusion:SAT explants from lean women are more sensitive to LPS-induced NF-κB activation than are VAT explants, leading to a depot-specific dysfunction of FFA storage. As SAT is the major player in FFA homoeostasis, this SAT dysfunction could be associated with visceral fat hypertrophy and systemic lipid disorders.

Highlights

  • The roles of subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) and visceral adipose tissue (VAT) in metabolic deregulation are intrinsically different

  • We evaluated the level of expression of the M1 macrophage marker

  • As human-resident adipose macrophages have both M2 and M1 phenotypic traits, we evaluated the expression of two M2 markers CD163 and the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The roles of subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) and visceral adipose tissue (VAT) in metabolic deregulation are intrinsically different. SAT protects against insulin resistance and metabolic disorders, whereas VAT does not.[1] In humans, the picture is less clear. Inflammation is a common feature of abnormal adipose tissue—whether hypertrophic in obesity[6] or atrophied in lipodystrophic patients7,8—and inflammation is linked to insulin resistance.[9] Previous studies have shown an increased number of macrophages in adipose tissue from obese patients with both M1 and M2 phenotypes.[10,11] Upregulation of immune responserelated gene expression in human SAT and VAT from obese subjects was found to be associated with downregulation of most of the adipocyte functions.[4]

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call