Abstract

ObjectivesTo compare image quality and metal artifact reduction between virtual monochromatic spectral imaging (VMSI), linearly blended dual-energy (DE) and single-energy (SE) images, each with and without dedicated iterative metal artifact reduction (iMAR) for CT-guided biopsy.Materials and methodsA biopsy trocar was positioned in the liver of six pigs. DE (Sn140/100kVp) and SE (120kVp/200mAs) acquisitions were performed with equivalent dose. From dual-energy datasets DE Q30-3 images and VMSI between 40–180 keV in steps of 20 keV were generated. From SE datasets I30-3 images were reconstructed. All images were reconstructed with and without iMAR. Objective image quality was analyzed applying density measurements at standardized positions (e.g. trocar tip and liver parenchyma adjacent to the trocar tip) and semi-automated threshold based segmentation. Subjective image quality was performed using semi-quantitative scores. Analyses were performed by two observers.ResultsAt the trocar tip quantitative image analysis revealed significant difference in CT numbers between reconstructions with iMAR compared to reconstructions without iMAR for VMSI at lower keV levels (80 and 100 keV; p = 0.03) and DE (p = 0.03). For liver parenchyma CT numbers were significantly higher in VMSI at high keV compared to low keV (p≤0.01). VMSI at high keV also showed higher CT numbers compared to DE and SE images, though not the level of statistical significance. The best signal-to-noise ratio for VMSI was at 80 keV and comparable to DE and SE. Noise was lowest at 80 keV and lower than in DE and SE. Subjective image quality was best with VMSI at 80 keV regardless of the application of iMAR. iMAR significantly improved image quality at levels of 140 keV and 160 keV. Interreader-agreement was good for quantitative and qualitative analysis.ConclusioniMAR improved image quality in all settings. VMSI with iMAR provided metal artifact reduction and better image quality at 80 keV and thus could improve the accurate positioning in CT-guided needle biopsy. In comparison, DE imaging did not improve image quality compared to SE.

Highlights

  • The histological collection of samples is crucial for therapy planning e.g. in HCC

  • At the trocar tip quantitative image analysis revealed significant difference in computed tomography (CT) numbers between reconstructions with iterative metal artifact reduction (iMAR) compared to reconstructions without iMAR for virtual monochromatic spectral imaging (VMSI) at lower keV levels (80 and 100 keV; p = 0.03) and DE (p = 0.03)

  • For liver parenchyma CT numbers were significantly higher in VMSI at high keV compared to low keV (p 0.01)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Liver biopsy can be guided by ultrasound, computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). MRI has a limited availability and CT is preferred over ultrasound especially for difficult accesses for local therapy (obese patients, long distance, small lesion diameter, subdiaphragmatic localization or subcostal access). Metal artifacts represent a significant limitation of the visibility of liver lesions during CTguided biopsy. It has been reported that the visualization is fourfold insufficient, for small liver lesions < 3 cm diameter [1]. False-negative biopsy results rise by 12.8% compared to lesions with good visualization [1]. Imaging the biopsy trocar without the cannula has been reported to mitigate metal artifacts in a phantom model and the cannula can be safely removed during imaging procedure [6]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.