Abstract

Performance-based functional tests for the evaluation of daily living activities demonstrate strong psychometric properties and solve many of the limitations associated with self- and informant-report questionnaires. Virtual reality (VR) technology, which has gained interest as an effective medium for administering interventions in the context of healthcare, has the potential to minimize the time-demands associated with the administration and scoring of performance-based assessments. To date, efforts to develop VR systems for assessment of everyday function in older adults generally have relied on non-immersive systems. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the feasibility of an immersive VR environment for the assessment of everyday function in older adults. We present a detailed case report of an elderly woman who performed an everyday activity in an immersive VR context (Virtual Reality Action Test) with two different types of interaction devices (controller vs. sensor). VR performance was compared to performance of the same task with real objects outside of the VR system (Real Action Test). Comparisons were made on several dimensions, including (1) quality of task performance (e.g., order of task steps, errors, use and speed of hand movements); (2) subjective impression (e.g., attitudes), and (3) physiological markers of stress. Subjective impressions of performance with the different controllers also were compared for presence, cybersickness, and usability. Results showed that the participant was capable of using controllers and sensors to manipulate objects in a purposeful and goal-directed manner in the immersive VR paradigm. She performed the everyday task similarly across all conditions. She reported no cybersickness and even indicated that interactions in the VR environment were pleasant and relaxing. Thus, immersive VR is a feasible approach for function assessment even with older adults who might have very limited computer experience, no prior VR exposure, average educational experiences, and mild cognitive difficulties. Because of inherent limitations of single case reports (e.g., unknown generalizability, potential practice effects, etc.), group studies are needed to establish the full psychometric properties of the Virtual Reality Action Test.

Highlights

  • Performance-based tests, that evaluate the ability to perform everyday tasks in the laboratory/clinic, solve many of the limitations associated with the use of self- and informantreport questionnaires of everyday functioning in people with cognitive impairment

  • On questionnaires of cognitive and functional abilities, Tina reported no significant change in her cognitive abilities as compared to 10 years ago [The ECOG SF12 = 1.75, cut-off score = 2.30 (Farias et al, 2008)] and minimal functional difficulties within the normal range [Functional Activity Questionnaire (FAQ) and the Activities of Daily Living-Prevention Instrument (ADL-PI)]

  • This paper reports the detailed analysis of a 91-year old woman’s (Tina) performance of a real (RAT) and immersive Virtual reality (VR) breakfast task (VRAT) to evaluate the feasibility of immersive VR for the assessment of everyday function in older adults

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Performance-based tests, that evaluate the ability to perform everyday tasks in the laboratory/clinic, solve many of the limitations associated with the use of self- and informantreport questionnaires of everyday functioning in people with cognitive impairment (see Giovannetti et al, 2013 for a review). Detailed analyses of errors and error-types afforded by performance-based tests of everyday function have promoted theoretical frameworks to better characterize the breakdown of everyday function due to cognitive impairment (see Schwartz, 2006; Giovannetti et al, 2013; for a review). Despite their validity, objectivity and potential for characterization of functional difficulties, performancebased measures have not been widely adopted in clinics or research studies, because generally they require an extraordinary effort to administer and score, especially when used to assess minor difficulties. In 2019 Giovannetti et al (2019) reported preliminary data from a modified VK, called the Virtual

Objectives
Methods
Results

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.