Abstract

Simple SummaryVirtual monoenergetic images from dual-energy CT are incrementally used in routine clinical practice. Thus, radiomic analysis will be more often performed on these images in the future. This study characterized the test–retest repeatability and reproducibility of radiomic features from virtual monoenergetic images and their impact on machine-learning-based lesion classification. The results of this study provide a basis to improve radiomic analyses and identify the role of feature stability in classification tasks when using virtual monoenergetic imaging with different scan or reconstruction parameters in multicenter clinical studies.The purpose of this study was to (i) evaluate the test–retest repeatability and reproducibility of radiomic features in virtual monoenergetic images (VMI) from dual-energy CT (DECT) depending on VMI energy (40, 50, 75, 120, 190 keV), radiation dose (5 and 15 mGy), and DECT approach (dual-source and split-filter DECT) in a phantom (ex vivo), and (ii) to assess the impact of VMI energy and feature repeatability on machine-learning-based classification in vivo in 72 patients with 72 hypodense liver lesions. Feature repeatability and reproducibility were determined by concordance–correlation–coefficient (CCC) and dynamic range (DR) ≥0.9. Test–retest repeatability was high within the same VMI energies and scan conditions (percentage of repeatable features ranging from 74% for SFDE mode at 40 keV and 15 mGy to 86% for DSDE at 190 keV and 15 mGy), while reproducibility varied substantially across different VMI energies and DECTs (percentage of reproducible features ranging from 32.8% for SFDE at 5 mGy comparing 40 with 190 keV to 99.2% for DSDE at 15 mGy comparing 40 with 50 keV). No major differences were observed between the two radiation doses (<10%) in all pair-wise comparisons. In vivo, machine learning classification using penalized regression and random forests resulted in the best discrimination of hemangiomas and metastases at low-energy VMI (40 keV), and for cysts at high-energy VMI (120 keV). Feature selection based on feature repeatability did not improve classification performance. Our results demonstrate the high repeatability of radiomics features when keeping scan and reconstruction conditions constant. Reproducibility diminished when using different VMI energies or DECT approaches. The choice of optimal VMI energy improved lesion classification in vivo and should hence be adapted to the specific task.

Highlights

  • Radiomics has been investigated for its use as a biomarker in disease characterization and for the assessment of oncologic treatment response [1,2,3,4], predicting treatment efficacy [5], and patient outcome [6,7,8]

  • Significant differences in the number of stable features were observed for dual-source dual-energy (DSDE) at the 15 mGy radiation dose only (mean percentage of stable features across all virtual monoenergetic images (VMI) energies for DSDE with 15 mGy, 85.2 ± 0.7% vs. DSDE with 5 mGy, 80.1 ± 0.2% (p < 0.001) vs. split-filter dual-energy CT (SFDE) with 15 mGy, 78.5 ± 2.6% (p < 0.001) vs. SFDE with 5 mGy, 79.0 ± 1.6% (p < 0.001))

  • There were no significant differences between mean percentages for DSDE at 5 mGy and SFDE at 5 and 15 mGy

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Radiomics has been investigated for its use as a biomarker in disease characterization and for the assessment of oncologic treatment response [1,2,3,4], predicting treatment efficacy [5], and patient outcome [6,7,8]. DECT enables the reconstruction of virtual monoenergetic images (VMI), which have been shown to improve lesion detection at low keV levels [10]. This is achieved by increasing the lesion-to-background contrast-to-noise ratio based on an increase in the CT attenuation of iodinated structures. A recent white paper of the Society of Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance [12] and a multi-institutional consensus [13] have advocated for the routine use of VMI at 50 keV (i.e., for high contrast) and 70 keV (i.e., for low noise) in DECT of the abdomen [13]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.