Abstract
BackgroundIn the time of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, in-person lectures had to be shifted to online learning. This study aimed to evaluate students’ and lecturers’ perception and effectiveness of a virtual inverted classroom (VIC) concept on clinical radiology in comparison to a historic control.MethodsIn the winter semester 2020/21, 136 fourth year medical students who completed the clinical radiology VIC during the pandemic, were included in the single centre, prospective study. Results were compared with a historic control that had finished the physical inverted classroom (PIC) in the immediately preceding year. The VIC consisted of an initial phase of self-determined preparation with learning videos and a second interactive phase of clinical case studies alternating between the virtual lecture hall and virtual buzz groups. At the end of the lecture series, students rated the lecture on a scale of 1 (most positive assessment) to 6 (most negative assessment) through an online survey platform. Additionally, they reported their impressions in free-form text. Lecturers were invited to comment on the VIC in a group interview. Main outcomes were final grades and student perception of the VIC.ResultsStudents’ general impression of VIC was lower than that of PIC (median value of 3 [IQR 4, 2] and 1 [IQR 0, 0], p < 0.001), respectively, p < 0.001). The highest rating was achieved concerning use of the audience response system (median 1 [IQR 1, 0]), and the lowest concerning the buzz groups (median 4 [IQR 5, 3]). Students stated that they would have appreciated more details on reading images, greater focus on plenary case studies, and provision of exam related scripts. Lecturers would have liked better preparation by students, more activity of students, and stronger assistance for group support. Exam grades after VIC were better than after PIC (median 1 [IQR 2, 1] and 2 [IQR 2,1], respectively, p < 0.001).ConclusionsStudents’ overall perception of VIC was satisfactory, although worse than PIC. Final grades improved compared to PIC. Provided an adapted buzz group size and support, VIC may serve as complement in medical education once the pandemic is over.
Highlights
Introduction to theInverted/Flipped Classroom Model in Education and Advanced Training in Medicine and in the Healthcare Professions
A total of 136 of 266 (51.1%) students (24.5 ± 3.3 years old, 90 female) participated in the voluntary end-ofsemester student survey. Students rated their general impression of the clinical radiology virtual inverted classroom (VIC) with a median value of 3 (IQR 4, 2) on a scale of 1 to 6, which was significantly worse compared to the historic control, who had attended the physical inverted classroom (PIC)
Except for utility of audience response system (ARS), all individual criteria including alignment of content, stating of learning objectives, didactic quality, engagement of lecturers, knowledge gained, learning video, and buzz group were rated lower with VIC than with PIC. Students gave their poorest rating to the buzz group and their best to the ARS (Fig. 2)
Summary
5. Teichgräber U, Ingwersen M, Mentzel HJ, Aschenbach R, Neumann R, Franiel T, et al Impact of a Heutagogical, Multimedia-Based Teaching Concept to Promote Self-Determined, Cooperative Student Learning in Clinical Radiology. In the time of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, in-person lectures had to be shifted to online learning. The year before the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, we had implemented the didactic concept of inverted classroom in clinical radiology. We intended to improve the traditional teacher-centred lecture that is mainly based on transfer of factual knowledge For this purpose, we had established a heutagogical didactic approach by combining self-determined multimedia-based [2] and subsequent cooperative elements [3, 4]. Virtual teaching is supposed to facilitate intercentre didactic collaboration [10]
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.