Virtual Arthroplasty Follow-Up: Better for the Trust, Patients, and the Planet.

Abstract

Background The Virtual Arthroplasty Follow-Up (VARF) Quality Improvement Project was initiated in March 2020 with the aim of improving patient experience while reducing costs to the trust, the patient, and the planet. Methodology This retrospective study was conducted in a district general hospital. Patients were assessed based on their Oxford Hip Score (OHS), University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) activity score, and an X-ray. A patient satisfaction survey was undertaken via phone call using a 10-point questionnaire. These responses were then correlated to age, distance travelled, and OHS/UCLA scores. The environmental impact was estimated using CO2emissions for driving and outpatient clinics taken from relevant literature. Results A total of 132 patients were enrolled in the project. Overall, 75% demonstrated a good outcome from both their X-ray and OHS/UCLA scores. Further, 23% of patients required an additional phone call, of which a further 77% were re-enrolled in the VARF pathway. Only five of 132 (3.8%) patients required a face-to-face review. The patient satisfaction survey enrolled 52 patients, 90% of whom were satisfied with the service. Only one patient stated being dissatisfied with the service. Overall, 77% of patients felt that the service saved them time, money, or both. The strongest predictor of patient satisfaction was the OHS (r = 0.52) where a score of <35 was associated with a nine-fold increase in either responding neutral or dissatisfied with the service. Accounting for both travel and clinic space, approximately 8 tonnes of CO2equivalent were saved. Once time and cost-saving from virtual clinics were included, this project saved the trust £21,408 and patients £948. Conclusions VARF has been shown to be an appropriate way to follow up arthroplasty patients which maintains high patient satisfaction while reducing the environmental impact, saving patients' time and money, and freeing up clinic space for other uses. A potential improvement of the process would be to triage those with low OHS to a more intensive follow-up.