Abstract

Traditional multidimensional scaling is a two-stage procedure. Thurstone's comparative judgment model is often used in the initial stage to determine the perceived distance between pairs of objects, under the assumption that the perceived distance between each pair is normally distributed across a population of subjects. These distances are used in the second stage to construct a geometric configuration of the objects in multidimensional space. A stimulation method was employed to study the effect of nonnormally distributed distances on the accuracy of the recovered configuration. Accurate configurations were generated from a variety of nonnormal distributions. Thus, the multidimensional scaling procedure appears to be robust with respect to violations of the normality assumption inherent in the comparative judgment model.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.