Abstract
The article is devoted to the issue of researching the procedural consequences of the violation of a person's right to a public trial of criminal proceedings. Such violations are divided into two categories – significant and non-significant. The authors give examples of Resolutions of the Criminal Cassation Court of the Supreme Court. This article is a form of systematization of the already accumulated knowledge of a number of the issues, and an endeavour of the modern vision. The topic is certainly relevant, since the rights of a person in criminal proceedings formulate and determine the fundamental ideas of all criminal procedural activity. At the same time, the procedural consequences of violating the elements of a person's right to a public trial of criminal proceedings are insufficiently studied in the doctrine of domestic criminal procedural law.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
