Abstract

BackgroundDifferent human responses to the same vaccine were frequently observed. For example, independent studies identified overlapping but different transcriptomic gene expression profiles in Yellow Fever vaccine 17D (YF-17D) immunized human subjects. Different experimental and analysis conditions were likely contributed to the observed differences. To investigate this issue, we developed a Vaccine Investigation Ontology (VIO), and applied VIO to classify the different variables and relations among these variables systematically. We then evaluated whether the ontological VIO modeling and VIO-based statistical analysis would contribute to the enhanced vaccine investigation studies and a better understanding of vaccine response mechanisms.ResultsOur VIO modeling identified many variables related to data processing and analysis such as normalization method, cut-off criteria, software settings including software version. The datasets from two previous studies on human responses to YF-17D vaccine, reported by Gaucher et al. (2008) and Querec et al. (2009), were re-analyzed. We first applied the same LIMMA statistical method to re-analyze the Gaucher data set and identified a big difference in terms of significantly differentiated gene lists compared to the original study. The different results were likely due to the LIMMA version and software package differences. Our second study re-analyzed both Gaucher and Querec data sets but with the same data processing and analysis pipeline. Significant differences in differential gene lists were also identified. In both studies, we found that Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment results had more overlapping than the gene lists and enriched pathway lists. The visualization of the identified GO hierarchical structures among the enriched GO terms and their associated ancestor terms using GOfox allowed us to find more associations among enriched but often different GO terms, demonstrating the usage of GO hierarchical relations enhance data analysis.ConclusionsThe ontology-based analysis framework supports standardized representation, integration, and analysis of heterogeneous data of host responses to vaccines. Our study also showed that differences in specific variables might explain different results drawn from similar studies.

Highlights

  • Different human responses to the same vaccine were frequently observed

  • Yellow Fever vaccine 17D (YF-17D) has become an excellent model to study general host responses induced by vaccinations, and many differentially expressed genes have been reported in YF-17D-vaccinated human subjects

  • Since Vaccine Ontology (VO), OBCS, and Ontology for Biomedical Investigations (OBI) all follow the Open Biomedical Ontology (OBO) Foundry ontology development principles [23] and use the same upper-level ontology, Basic Formal Ontology (BFO) [24], these terms coming from different ontologies were efficiently and seamlessly aligned to each other in Vaccine Investigation Ontology (VIO)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Different human responses to the same vaccine were frequently observed. For example, independent studies identified overlapping but different transcriptomic gene expression profiles in Yellow Fever vaccine 17D (YF17D) immunized human subjects. YF-17D has become an excellent model to study general host responses induced by vaccinations, and many differentially expressed genes have been reported in YF-17D-vaccinated human subjects These studies reported different results even though similar experimental designs were used. Three studies, Gaucher et al [9], Querec et al [10], and Scherer et al [11], all used human subjects who were all vaccinated with YF-17D or YF-VAX (made with a specific YF-17D strain) These three studies generated overlapping but quite different gene expression profiles [9,10,11]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call